Calum Puttergill vs Marcelo Arevalo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W L L L L L
Form
W L W W W W W W W LHead-2-Head: Puttergill 1 - 0 Arevalo
They have played 2 sets in total, with Puttergill winning 2 and Arevalo winning 0. The last match between Puttergill and Arevalo was at the Bendigo Challenger, 13-01-2020, Second, Hard with Calum Puttergill getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Calum Puttergill | 1 |
| Marcelo Arevalo | 0 |
Bendigo Challenger(13-01-2020)
6
4
6
2
| Puttergill | Stats | Arevalo |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 888 | Ranking | 878 |
| 663 | Highest Rank | 139 |
| 31 | Age | 34 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 14 |
| 49% (170-176) | Career Total W/L | 58% (378-277) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $147,030 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kenin VS Sun PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Puttergill VS Arevalo H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Calum Puttergill
Player
Marcelo Arevalo
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Puttergill VS Arevalo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:11:20 | Average Match Time | 1:11:20 |
| 59% (34/58) | 1st Serve % | 67% (32/48) |
| 71% (24/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (14/32) |
| 58% (14/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 69% (11/16) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 48% (23/48) | Return Points Win % | 34% (20/58) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Calum Puttergill Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Calum Puttergill
45%
(
29 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Calum Puttergill
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Calum Puttergill
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jake Delaney
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Calum Puttergill
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Moerani Bouzige
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Kokoro Isomura
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Harper
Player
Calum Puttergill
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Preston Brown
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Marcelo Arevalo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 5 | 2-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 4 | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 4 | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 4-6 6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | |||
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Marcelo Arevalo
Player
Wojciech Marek
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Marcelo Arevalo
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49% (170/176) | Win/Loss | 58% (378/277) |
| 49% (388/400) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (877/668) |
| 50% (3589/3586) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7775/6862) |
| 48% (123/132) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (199/144) |
| 53% (38/34) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (171/110) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 29% (6/15) |
| 50% (9/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 20% (2/8) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 353 | Aces Total | 1650 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1064 | Total Double Faults | 1174 |
| 1:2:41 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 411.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 556.14 |
| 62% (8855/14246) | 1st Serve % | 63% (14909/23818) |
| 62% (5467/8855) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (10538/14909) |
| 43% (2341/5392) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4473/8909) |
| 46% (715/1571) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (943/2246) |
| 43% (6080/14225) | Return Points Win % | 39% (9268/24048) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 29% (5/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 67% (31/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 26% (6/17) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (28/45) | Challenger W/L | 51% (140/135) |
| 52% (142/131) | Futures W/L | 67% (195/95) |
| 49% (169/344) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (351/615) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 61% (20/33) |
| 42% (30/72) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (99/210) |
| 50% (48/96) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (102/203) |
| 87% (169/147) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (372/319) |
| 13% (169/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (372/52) |
| 13% (177/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (283/58) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
